<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The UNFCCC Expert Reviewer Training Programme is Ongoing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ghginstitute.org/2010/03/03/the-unfccc-expert-reviewer-training-programme-is-ongoing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ghginstitute.org/2010/03/03/the-unfccc-expert-reviewer-training-programme-is-ongoing/</link>
	<description>Online Training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 02:22:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gillenwater</title>
		<link>http://ghginstitute.org/2010/03/03/the-unfccc-expert-reviewer-training-programme-is-ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gillenwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghginstitute.org/?p=1956#comment-554</guid>
		<description>John,

We cannot say, a priori, what kind of cross-recognition would exist.  It is up to our expert/stakeholder committee to decide the competency criteria for the professional certification and what categories of certification will be developed.  We will work towards cross-recognition, but only to the degree that quality and rigor is not compromised.  We cannot predict at this stage that the committee will agree with what CSA has set up.  The committee is global in composition and our working framework is that we have to ensure a high degree of competency.

And, as Dean of our educational programs, I am not involved in this committee process, as we must maintain a firewall between our training programs and professional certification programs.  But you can find out more here:
http://ghginstitute.org/professional-programs/certification/

Sincerely,
Michael Gillenwater</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>We cannot say, a priori, what kind of cross-recognition would exist.  It is up to our expert/stakeholder committee to decide the competency criteria for the professional certification and what categories of certification will be developed.  We will work towards cross-recognition, but only to the degree that quality and rigor is not compromised.  We cannot predict at this stage that the committee will agree with what CSA has set up.  The committee is global in composition and our working framework is that we have to ensure a high degree of competency.</p>
<p>And, as Dean of our educational programs, I am not involved in this committee process, as we must maintain a firewall between our training programs and professional certification programs.  But you can find out more here:<br />
<a href="http://ghginstitute.org/professional-programs/certification/" rel="nofollow">http://ghginstitute.org/professional-programs/certification/</a></p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Michael Gillenwater</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McKay</title>
		<link>http://ghginstitute.org/2010/03/03/the-unfccc-expert-reviewer-training-programme-is-ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>John McKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghginstitute.org/?p=1956#comment-547</guid>
		<description>Are you recognizing the CSA-America GHG verifier accreditation?  seems to me there may be a proliferation out of control here unless we get some cross-referencing done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you recognizing the CSA-America GHG verifier accreditation?  seems to me there may be a proliferation out of control here unless we get some cross-referencing done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
